For Christmas I got an interesting present from a good friend - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and gratisafhalen.be it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and really funny in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of composing, but it's likewise a bit repeated, and really verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's prompts in collecting data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a strange, repetitive hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, since pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can purchase any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody producing one in anyone's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is meant as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He wants to broaden his variety, producing various categories such as sci-fi, and maybe providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - selling AI-generated goods to .

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we really imply human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for imaginative functions should be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without consent must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely powerful however let's construct it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have selected to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually decided to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to utilize creators' material on the internet to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise highly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its best carrying out industries on the unclear guarantee of development."

A government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made until we are absolutely positive we have a useful plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to help them certify their material, access to top quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, a national data library consisting of public data from a large range of sources will likewise be made available to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of factors which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training information and whether it should be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for lespoetesbizarres.free.fr a fraction of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It is complete of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to check out in parts because it's so verbose.

But offered how quickly the tech is developing, I'm unsure for how long I can stay positive that my significantly slower human writing and editing skills, are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.